We live in a world where academic differences are acknowledged on a daily basis. These recognition’s can be intentional, such as when comparing and contrasting district, state, and national data in professional development workshops. They can also be unintentional which can commonly be seen by two teachers talking informally, perhaps when engaging in a casual conversation in the teacher’s lounge that involves sharing the days stories. However, what most people do not realize is that occasionally, the intentional and unintentional forces couple to create a glamorized, dramatic, and realistic portrayal of the way students, school, and relationships are in various cultural settings.
I know you are questioning how I can be so bold as to describe such a serious topic of interest as “glamorized,” “dramatic,” yet somehow still “realistic.” Let me explain, through the affects of mass media, education of various cultures has, in my mind, been GLAMORIZED. Think of popular films- the teacher comes in trying to be superman. Then ask yourself, is the teacher taking time to get to know the students’ individual interests, needs, desires, expectations, goals, and most importantly stories. Now, yes, most of these stories are based on true events, making it very REALISTIC (we as teachers know that in order to build the relationships mimicked on the big screen, all of those things had to happen) but could the trials and tribulations that teacher and those students experienced together really be captured in a 120-minute film? To think the viewer has an accurate portrayal of what those 180 days looked like in 120 minutes is absurd, that means, on average, each school day would only receive a minute and a half of airtime. Face it, if you want your major motion picture to go to the big screen, you’re not going to include a lesson on Christopher Columbus that lasts forty minutes, nor are you going to show the fifteen minute differentiated center rotations, or even the nightly homework regime. You are going to show the hardships, the victories, the moments that cast incredible amounts of empathy, fear, anticipation, and excitement among the viewers. How do you do this? By incorporating DRAMA.
Which leads me here, recommending a movie to you that does, more or less, glamorize the world of education; that does tell a story many individuals have lived, and that reels viewers in with the dramatic hardships and triumphs of the main character: Precious.
Precious, directed by Lee Daniels, is a movie with nearly a two hour run time. It shares the story of a young girl from Harlem. She is African American, overweight, and illiterate. She has been abused multiple times by her own mother and even her mother’s boyfriend. She is pregnant with her second child when she enrolls into an alternative school in an attempt to provide a better life for her and her family in the future. During the two hours, Daniels is able to capture something amazing that not many directors (at least not in my opinion) can do. He is able to capture the culture of Precious’ childhood. He is able to portray schooling, cultural assimilation, and social mobility in a way that stays true to the era the story takes place in. Furthermore, he was able to mimic the relationships between schools and homes often seen in an inner city setting.
Before I jump into breaking down these three key components, I want to share with you a little bit about myself and why I feel so passionately about this movie. My blog so far has consisted with little snippets of who I am and how I was raised. For 22 years, I was the Macedonian girl with old-fashioned parents growing up in a rural country town. What you may not know, though, is during those years, I so badly wanted to live in the city (my dad moved us out of Detroit when we were barely walking). In college, I specialized in urban education with hopes of one day teaching, and living in a big city. Movies like Precious, Boyz in the Hood, and most popularly, Freedom Writers, further motivated me, and in 2013 I found myself teaching on the south side of the nation’s third largest school district. During my three years there, I started realizing all of the things previously mentioned. I started seeing how media glamorized inner city education. I was experiencing the dramatic events (students getting shot, block to block violence, drug abuse, and so much more). That is when I started realizing how real all of it was. This wasn’t just a plot of a movie, for children all over inner cities, this was their reality.
My personal reality has been enlightened thanks the readings and discussions we have had during the course. While I understand the point of the concluding reflection was to try and address one of the topics throughout the course, I found it important to look into all three. I am able to see not just the glamorization, drama, and realism of education and culture, I am better able to understand where it stems from: the culture of childhood, school cultural assimilation, and social mobility, and the relationship between schools and homes. Instead of sharing my realities with you (although snippets are included), as they are not truly my own rather that of former students, I will share with you the story of Precious- the illiterate, pregnant, aspiring and inspiring teen from Harlem.
Although we do not see actual clips of Precious growing up, there are flashbacks Precious has throughout the movie and stories that are shared in confidentiality between her and her teacher that help the viewers better understand her culture of childhood. In the movie, we see Precious being verbally, and even physically abused, by her mother on multiple occasions. She gets hollered at for not making dinner to her mother’s standards, and for having high hopes for her future. It is clear to see that not only is Precious very independent for a teenager still living under her mother’s roof; rather, she is also very mature in the way she takes care of her dependent mother. Despite this film being released in 2009, it is important to remember that it takes place in 1987. Thus, this behavioral norm for both children and parents was significantly different.
Overtime, the way parents interact with and look after their child has changed drastically. Furthermore, the culture of the environment plays a significant impact in this as well. In my cycle one post regarding the culture of childhood, I look deeper into this through the use of a course reading by Pamela Druckerman entitled “Bringing Up Bebe.” Druckerman looks in depth at parenting in the French culture. Parents there are strict while still remaining low-key and calm. This was exactly the opposite of how I grew up with my very traditional Macedonian parents. They were just downright strict. Rules were enforced heavily and picking up sticks in the yard was a common form of discipline. It seems quite opposite for Precious (as well as many of my students on the south side). There are no clear definitions of the rules, rather just consequences and punishments for not meeting expectations. For example, Precious was once pushed down the stairs by her mother for being too busy with school and neglecting her house duties (which are still unclear to me as the viewer, even). While nothing this extreme ever happened with my students, the overall message of consequences without clear expectations is something that resonates with me as a teacher. One specific example stands out: a student had been receiving 4/5 on his sight word tests (this was still passing) yet when the mother saw the score upon pick up one day she had embarrassed him in front of his classmates for it not being up to her expectations (which obviously was 5/5). However, the five year old did not know this. The embarrassment caused will last a life time all because of a single moment of miscommunication between the mother, child, and even myself at the teacher. The culture of learning is set at a very early age, and what I have learned is that it is important for everyone to be on the same page.
Druckerman does a great job of stating her observations, but one thing I am still unclear about even upon concluding this course is why do these differences occur. In my first post, I ask “Who do we adapt these behaviors from? Where do we get our discipline techniques? Most importantly, how do we embrace these differences in the classroom?” – the last question weighing the heaviest on my mind.
I think one of the ways to better understand how to embrace these differences is to look at schooling, cultural assimilation, and social mobility. Cycle two brought us a very interesting text entitled “Hunger of Memory” written by Richard Rodriquez. In the text Rodriquez looks at bilingual and monolingual education and poses the idea that students cannot accept learning the public language until they feel they belong there. Although the movie Precious does not provide viewers with this idea of monolingual and bilingual education, the idea of schooling, cultural assimilation, and social mobility is still there through the use of language if we look closely enough.
Similar to the popular story of the Freedom Writers, Precious’ teacher encourages her students to write. This in and of itself is a very special language. Now, some of you may be saying how can it be a language when it is in fact their native language (that is, they are being asked to write in English and they speak in English). You see, you have to remember these students in the alternative classroom are illiterate. Yes, they are able to speak English, but there are several scenes in the movie that imply they are unaware of entry-level phonics (take for example the scene where the class is going over letters of the alphabet and using phonetics to spell words). Writing, although in English form as the case may have it, is a very complex language. Words are not always spelled how they sound and some letters make more than one sound.
Going back to the point Rodriguez makes regarding students being unable to accept a given language until they feel a sense of belonging, there is a scene where Precious refuses to write. She simply “wasn’t feeling it.” That is a feeling I most certainly can resonate with on both a personal and professional level. In my cycle two post, I mention a student who was having a hard time learning math. I soon realized that was because she felt more comfortable using her native language of Spanish. Thus, I chose to integrate both languages in our daily math lesson. By doing so, I think I was able to make her feel more comfortable with the environment. She was, all of a sudden, a part of the crowd because I incorporated her private language into the whole group lesson. This was an opportunity I never had growing up. Similar to my student, I struggled with math. My parents would show me concepts and ways to solve equations that were acceptable to their time. Yet, these were often refuted by my teachers, as I recall one day I confidently went to the board to solve a problem. Despite getting the right answer, my work was wrong and the teacher just couldn’t wrap her head around how I came to such a conclusion (and fifth grade me did not really have the means to explain it the same way my father did). After that, I kind of shut down- I just “wasn’t feeling it.”
I think when analyzing these experiences, reflecting on the movie, and drawing conclusions from Rodriguez’s piece it is important to realize that although my personal example and the example outlined in Precious do not necessarily involve a foreign language, they do in fact represent an academic language that, I feel, far too often gets forgotten about. For someone illiterate, like Precious, or even someone who may lag behind in math, such as myself as a child, academic language can be extremely hard to understand and even produce. I withdrew after my experience, and if you are familiar with Precious’ story she did to- that is, until her teacher did something none of my teachers ever took time to do (something I did with my five year old student when she wasn’t understanding mathematical content) and that is by making them feel like they are apart of the crowd.
So, how do we do that? I think that comes from the importance of tying in the home and community with the school. Cycle three provided us with the opportunity to read a book that examines development of the “whole child” and Montessori education. In cycle three I pose the question of what would happen if educators incorporated students interests and needs into the core curriculum. I ask readers what would happen if educators allowed more choices for students to express themselves based on these interests or even learning styles?
The story of Precious shows potential ways for these questions to be answered. For example, the idea of an alternative school itself shows a sense of choice. Precious was not forced to go there after being kicked out of her other school. Rather, it was a mere suggestion she took to heart and looked in to as a way to better herself and her soon-to-be developing family. By making sure the audience knows that this was Precious’ choice rather than something being forced upon her we can see that Precious is intrinsically motivated by something, although at this point of the movie we are unaware of what. While the movie shows other strategies to build home/school connections, I struggled to find tactics I could implement in my classroom given I work with a much younger age.
As previously mentioned, I understand the point of the concluding reflection was to try and address one of the topics throughout the course, I found it important to look into all three. Why? I did this because I firmly believe each and every one of these concepts build off one another as outlined in my analysis of Precious and through the reflections of my own experiences and practices. We cannot have a relationship between home and school without understanding the culture of our students and how we can better assimilate culture and promote social mobility in schooling. Furthermore, we cannot have cultural assimilation or social mobility in the classroom without understanding the various cultures of childhood. Let’s, again, look to the movie. Before Precious’ teacher could be successful, in any regard, she had to understand the culture of childhood in Harlem (more specifically, in Precious’ home in Harlem). Once she understood that Precious was verbally abused, illiterate, and even pregnant, she could better assimilate her. One way this happened was acknowledging the complexity of writing in the English language by going back to basic phonics lessons and encouraging the daily use of phonetic spelling rather than correct spelling. Through writing, the teacher was better able to establish a relationship between home and school. The relationship, although rocky at first, eventually leads to a confidence that allows Precious to leave her abusive home and pursue her vision of providing and caring for her two children. She was able to carry out this vision for a new home thanks to the coping, academic, social, emotional, and physical skills reinforced by the school. In other words, the school took into account this idea of the “whole child” and created an environment where the whole child could develop and flourish.
Developing the whole child is something extremely important and something I hope to do through my teaching practices. While the movie Precious focused on the concepts of culture in the classroom needed to aide this development, it failed to provide me with age appropriate techniques to use in my classroom which was one of it’s downfalls. On the upside of things, the movie did cause me to react in a very personal way. Although Precious is older, her situation is one many of my students experience. It was quite heart wrenching in the beginning while the foundation of her story was being laid out, and refreshing when the issues and tribulations were resolved. Throughout this whole post, I have given personal examples of a few of the things I have experienced in a neighborhood quite similar to Harlem. However, these are just a few stories. The experiences I had personally were very different. My parents didn’t have to worry about a bullet going through my arm or head when we were at the park. I didn’t have to worry about being severely punished for not meeting my parent’s expectations. I didn’t have to worry about other adults in the surrounding communities viewing me as incompetent and my dreams unreachable. It has been a culture shock all the way around, and in a positive light as well. I was able to see the hardships outlines in the story, and I was able to see the outcome. I do wish; however, the movie provided me with more steps to take in order to help my students achieve the desired outcome.
I think that is where the course discussions and readings really helped me reflect on my own practices and personal experiences from growing up to better see what I need to do to meet the needs of potential future students. Through the first cycle I was ale to better understand a little bit more about my background and how experiences and expectations do reflect a child’s behavior. The second cycle taught me the importance of assimilation. While the third really helped me realize how important integrating home and school is. In order to better build this connection, I have to start from the beginning. I think to better understand the culture of childhood; I would like to send out a survey to parents and students. This will help me better understand in home practices and expectations. I can also better learn student interests, learning styles and needs. By doing this, I can lay a foundation for better allowing assimilation and mobility within the classroom. I can do this, similarly to how I have in the past (as stated with the non-native speaker previously) by incorporating various languages, learning styles (such as flexible seating), and centers that are catered to student interests. Lastly, I hope to further connect the home and school. I am still not one hundred percent sure how to do this, as I have taught the past three years in a very structured environment that follows strict curriculum and schedules. However, come fall, I am going to be working in a school that takes more of a Montessori approach and emphasizes the importance of the “whole child.” I hope to take my reflections from my past experiences, analysis from the movie, and material gathered from the course to better develop as a professional. In turn, helping students to develop wholly and sufficiently in order to be the best possible version of themselves that they can be!